Doctors' Support Network blog
'What is sexual harassment?
As sexual harassment scandals fill the airwaves the traditional definitional question emerges: but what IS sexual harassment?
There is a legal definition. You’ll find it section 26(2) of the Equality Act 2010. Let me break it down ...
First, there has to be conduct of a “sexual nature”. What counts? Check out Para 7.13 of the Code of Practice on Employment (2011) ...
“verbal, non-verbal or physical conduct including unwelcome sexual advances, touching, forms of sexual assault, sexual jokes ...displaying pornographic photographs or drawings or sending emails with material of a sexual nature” ...
So could it cover feeling a journalist’s knees under the table? Oh yes, absolutely.
Second, the conduct must be *”unwanted”* conduct. If the journo is happy to have her knees touched, it’s not harassment. But there’s more, the conduct must have the purpose OR the effect of: 1. Violating the victim’s dignity; or 2. creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for them .. Note, purpose OR effect. So if you are trying to violate their dignity you don’t need to succeed to be in trouble.
Equally, if you create a hostile environment you don’t escape merely because that was not your purpose.
When considering whether the conduct has had one of the two effects mentioned above, the tribunal must look at 3 things: 1. the victim’s perception; 2. the other circs of the case; and 3. whether it is reasonable for the conduct to have the effect. So if someone is irrationally over-sensitive that will not count but it's the victim’s perception and not the harasser’s that counts
So, for instance, the fact that you can’t see why a journo would object to having their knee squeezed is not important. If it is something a reasonable person could find intimidating or degrading, for eg, that may well do. Also, victim’s perceptions may reasonably differ, so the fact that one finds it trivial does not mean all will.
The standard is not that of the hardiest victim.
Harassment “It was different 15 to 20 years ago”.
I don’t understand this argument. Assume that the statement is true. So what? A lot of social attitudes have changed in the last 15 - 20 years. Have these people been on the moon? Did they not notice the huge social change they claim has occurred? However, I’ve been dealing with sexual harassment in the workplace cases for some 26 years. I don’t think things are radically different now
The current legal definition is an evolution of the one contained in the EU Commission recommendation on sexual harassment from 1991. It was quickly adopted by UK tribunals and applied in harassment cases (which were then treated as a species of direct discrimination). There might be cases that would be unlawful under the present test that would not have been then, but I struggle to think of one. Workplaces were not Carry On fantasies with women giggling uncontrollably at a stream of lewd double entendres.
Being the subject of humiliating or degrading treatment was no less destructive of people’s dignity in 1990 than it is now.
We should not confuse inability effectively to challenge behaviour with tacit approval.'
Sean's Twitter feed is @seanjonesqc
But all that was years ago and I have been well, apart from a less serious relapse which led to me taking antidepressants for life. I have now been completely well for the best part of ten years. That is - well in terms of my mental health.
We proposed a symposium of three talks with the overall title:
Fiona is a Consultant in Public Health Medicine with 25 years experience in wellbeing and resilience who is also a fully qualified 'Executive Coach'. Read on to find out how to choose the right coach for you.
Find more articles similar to this on our ' Professional Support' page.
Photo Credit: Joe Vericker/Photobureau, Inc.
Our blog page will be a place to collect new stories and articles on our website, which can be linked to social media and elsewhere. Blogs also help to increase recognition of the website by search engines.
What type of story is suitable for the DSN blog?
The blog will contain a mix of stories about DSN's activities and physician health in general.
Can DSN members / friends contribute an article for the blog?
Yes of course. A good blog feature article would be approximately 300 words in length and have a couple of clear (non copyright) photos to illustrate it. If you are not sure whether your idea would fit the DSN blog, then ask us via firstname.lastname@example.org. Contributions will be edited to house style and published to fit in with our schedule if the article is deemed to be suitable for DSN.